Navigating Energy Transitions in Southeast Asia

Metals and Mining Review | Tuesday, November 28, 2023

Coal is prominently present in the immediate future of Southeast Asia, as coal-fired plants account for higher than 40 per cent of the region’s power generation. Numerous regional governments considered liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a middleman between moving from coal to renewable energy.

FREMONT, CA: Across Southeast Asia, governments are faced with increased energy demands that necessitate major investments. These are not just for solar, but also for wind and other renewables, including hydrocarbons. If the latter is not given using natural gas, countries are presumed to continue their dependence on coal, which would heavily undermine their aims.

Coal is prominently present in the immediate future of Southeast Asia, as coal-fired plants account for higher than 40 per cent of the region’s power generation. Numerous regional governments considered liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a middleman between moving from coal to renewable energy.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

The usage of LNG produces fewer greenhouse gases (GHG) when compared to coal and was expected to be considerably more cost-effective, and therefore more feasible than an immediate switch to renewable energy. However, the LNG prices are more dynamic and Southeast Asian countries are being overbid by the European nations, and they must replace natural gas that was originally being imported. States in Southeast Asia are not expected to import the same amount of LNG as before or had intended. Natural gases which end up getting added to the energy mix in Southeast Asia are expected to be used to meet growing demands, rather than the replacement of existing coal usage.

The Energy Transition Plans for Southeast Asia

Indonesia

The energy mix of the country comprises 60 per cent coal, 21 per cent oil and gas, 8 per cent hydropower, 6 per cent bioenergy, 5 per cent geothermal, and lower than 1 per cent of solar and wind. It is Southeast Asia’s most populous country and therefore constitutes 40 per cent of the region’s energy consumption.

Indonesia's National Electricity Supply Business Plan for 2021 to 2030 forecasts that energy demand is expected to increase by 4.9 per cent annually and the demand for electricity in the industrial and household sectors is expected to rise substantially. About 60 per cent of the electricity in the country is generated by coal, and coal has a price cap, which pits it against the cleaner forms of energy. The Indonesian government aims to generate 23 per cent of its electricity through renewables by the year 2025 and has achieved up to 11 per cent as of the year 2022.

That being said, there seems to be a large gap in financing. Mooted investments in clean energy and permanently ceasing the operations of coal plants would end up costing around USD 25 billion per year through 2030. Indonesia has invested USD 3 billion in renewables from 2017 through 2021.

Philippines

The energy mix in the country of the Philippines consists of 55 per cent of coal, 22 per cent of oil and gas, 11 per cent of geothermal, 7 per cent of hydropower, and 4 per cent of solar and wind energies. Within its current transition plan, which is the Philippine Energy Plan 2020-2040, there are multiple reduction targets over the next few decades. By the year 2030, the country plans on reducing emissions by 75 per cent and also increasing the percentage of its renewable energy mix to 35. Nearly 97 per cent of the Philippines’ commitment is conditional on external funding. Without the use of external support, its emission targets are likely to be unsuccessful.

The country is amidst an energy crisis. Its electricity prices are one of the highest in Asia, indeterminate supply is resulting in nationwide brownouts, and the Malampaya gas field, which is offshore and provides the city with 20 per cent of its electricity, is expected to be depleted by 2027.

The Marcos administration has displayed vapid interest in reducing the prices of electricity, implying that coal will play a large role in the energy mix for the foreseeable future. The Philippines has also become increasingly dependent on imported coal, which is the biggest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, as the most reliable and economical source of electricity in the past few years. Theoretically, LNG can serve as a transitional fuel for coal, but its realistic implementation in the Philippines has been slow. The government has validated seven LNG terminal projects, but out of them, the two that are predicted to become functional will not contribute substantially to meeting the country’s sustainability targets.

Vietnam

The energy mix of Vietnam consists of 30 percent of coal, 13 percent of oil and gas, 28 percent of hydropower, 24 percent of solar, and 5 percent of wind. By the year 2050, Vietnam aims to be carbon neutral, with renewable energy providing 75 percent of its electricity by 2045. Presently, the country is highly dependent on coal and is one of the world’s top 20 coal producers. Vietnam has a centralised economy, in which 75 percent of coal-fired plants are owned by state-owned enterprises, which is why the government should behave as the main driver for the energy transition.

The industrialisation over the past two decades, which has been backed by coal, has made the protection of energy a high priority for the government, and Hanoi is not likely to permit any limit on economic growth as the cost of decarbonisation.

More in News

Alluvial gold projects can lose money before equipment breaks down. The risk begins when a plant is selected before the deposit is understood. Particle size, mineral association, clay content and water conditions can change what a wash plant must do, yet purchasing discussions can still center on throughput and purchase price. A machine may move large volumes without recovering enough gold to justify the capital. For executives approving equipment, the useful question is not simply how much material a plant can process, but how its recovery system fits the actual deposit. Deposit characterization matters because placer material rarely behaves as a uniform feed. Assay results establish grade, but plant selection also depends on how gold is distributed through the material and what other minerals enter the processing circuit. Sampling and mineralogical work should therefore shape classification and concentration before equipment is specified. Variability across benches or river stretches also matters because a circuit tuned to one sample can underperform as the feed changes. A supplier that begins with machine models rather than the ore shifts geological uncertainty onto the mine owner, who may discover the mismatch only after commissioning. Fine-gold recovery deserves separate attention. Simple gravity layouts can perform very differently across particle sizes, so buyers should examine how the plant handles coarse fractions and smaller particles rather than accept a single recovery figure. Concentrators also need to be evaluated as part of the full circuit, not as isolated machines. Field conditions matter. Test data should identify the particle-size range behind the claim and the conditions under which it was achieved. Recirculated water carrying clay or suspended solids can alter separation performance, making water handling part of process design rather than a utility decision. Site constraints can change the purchasing decision sharply. Remote startups may benefit from mobile plants that arrive largely assembled and reduce construction work. River projects introduce mobility and dredging requirements that fixed land-based layouts may not accommodate well. Water availability can favor closed-loop recycling, provided returned water is suitable for concentration stages. Production security deserves attention where recovered gold passes through several hands before it reaches the gold room. None of these issues is prominent on a quotation sheet, yet each can determine whether the plant fits the mine after delivery. “Its in-house ore testing and plant design process enables DOVE Equipment & Machinery Co., Ltd. to match the processing line to the deposit rather than start with a standard wash plant.” Pre-shipment engineering can expose the difference between a configured plant and a catalog sale. A credible manufacturer should translate sample data into a specific processing route and explain how coarse and fine fractions are handled. It should also show how the configuration responds to water limits and deployment constraints. Capital comparison belongs on recovered production, not purchase price alone. A lower purchase price carries little meaning if the circuit leaves saleable gold in the tailings. This deposit-led approach is central to DOVE Equipment & Machinery Co., Ltd. offering for alluvial gold projects in Asia. Its in-house ore testing and plant design process enables DOVE Equipment & Machinery Co., Ltd. to match the processing line to the deposit rather than start with a standard wash plant. Its range includes mobile and portable plants, while RiverMiner combines dredging with floating processing for river deposits. DOVE also addresses coarse and fine gold recovery through dedicated concentration. Its plant designs can incorporate recycled-water use and production security. For buyers comparing equipment on recovered value rather than sticker price, the difference is where DOVE starts: with the deposit. ...Read more
The global precious metals sector is moving beyond its traditional mandate of extraction and production to embrace a holistic operational ethos grounded in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles. For the gold and silver industries, this shift represents more than a regulatory box-ticking exercise; it has become a fundamental definition of value. This evolution is characterized by the harmonization of global standards, the deployment of "green" extraction technologies, and a redefined social contract with host communities. The narrative has shifted from risk mitigation to value creation, where sustainability performance is viewed as a proxy for operational excellence and long-term asset viability. Harmonization of Governance and Industry Standards For the gold sector, this is most visible in the widespread adoption of comprehensive frameworks that set out the criteria for what constitutes "responsible" production. These principles cover a broad spectrum of requirements—from ethical business conduct and supply chain transparency to environmental stewardship and human rights. Crucially, these frameworks are no longer self-declared; they now require independent, third-party assurance. This shift towards external verification has introduced a level of rigor previously unseen, forcing operators to maintain audit-ready data on everything from water usage to labor practices. Silver development, while often intersecting with gold due to geological co-occurrence, has also developed its own distinct sustainability narrative. Industry bodies dedicated to silver have launched initiatives that align the metal’s production with global sustainable development goals. Because a significant portion of global silver supply is produced as a by-product of other metals (such as lead, zinc, and copper), the governance of silver is frequently tied to broader multi-metal standards. However, specific protocols regarding the "chain of custody" have emerged to ensure that silver entering the solar and electronics sectors is sourced from operations that meet high ethical benchmarks. A key trend in governance is the "equivalency" and interoperability of standards. Recognizing the administrative burden of complying with multiple overlapping frameworks, the industry has moved toward cross-recognition of standards. This harmonization allows development projects to focus on implementation rather than bureaucratic duplication. Furthermore, governance has expanded with boards of directors now frequently including sustainability committees with specific oversight powers, ensuring that ESG performance is directly linked to executive compensation and corporate strategy. Environmental Stewardship and Technological Innovation The environmental footprint of mining is the most visible aspect of ESG, and the industry is responding with a wave of technological innovation aimed at decoupling production from ecological impact. In the energy sector, the gold and silver sectors are rapidly integrating renewable power sources into development plans. Remote mine sites, traditionally reliant on diesel generators, are increasingly deploying hybrid microgrids that combine solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays and wind turbines with battery storage systems. This transition is particularly poetic for the silver industry, as silver itself is a critical material in the manufacturing of solar panels. Thus, the industry is effectively consuming its own product to lower its carbon intensity, creating a circular narrative that appeals to green investors. Water stewardship has evolved from a compliance issue to a critical operational risk management strategy. Modern gold and silver developments are designing "zero-discharge" facilities that recycle water indefinitely within the processing circuit. Innovations in dry-stack tailings technology are replacing traditional wet tailings dams. By dewatering waste material and stacking it like soil, operators significantly reduce the risk of dam failures and minimize the volume of fresh water required. This method also allows for concurrent reclamation, in which land is restored progressively throughout the mine's life rather than waiting until closure. Processing innovations are also reshaping the chemical footprint of extraction. In gold recovery, bio-leaching—the use of naturally occurring bacteria to oxidize ore and liberate metal—is gaining traction as a cleaner alternative to traditional roasting methods. Advanced cyanide management codes have further standardized the transport, storage, and disposal of reagents, while research into non-toxic alternative lixiviants continues to progress. For silver, which often requires complex metallurgy, new flotation regimes and sensor-based ore sorting are enabling facilities to process less material to produce the same amount of metal, thereby reducing energy consumption and waste generation per ounce produced. Social License and the Transformation of Community Relations Indigenous engagement has also moved to the forefront of social governance. Best practices now dictate that engagement begins at the earliest stages of exploration, long before a shovel hits the ground. This engagement is increasingly formalized through impact and benefit agreements that codify the rights of indigenous groups, protect cultural heritage sites, and ensure equitable financial participation in the project's success. The industry is moving away from "consultation" towards "partnership," recognizing that long-term stability requires the active consent and participation of local stakeholders. Health and safety standards remain the non-negotiable bedrock of social responsibility. The concept of "zero harm" has evolved into comprehensive safety cultures that utilize data analytics to predict and prevent incidents. Wearable technology and proximity detection systems are becoming standard in underground operations, helping protect workers by monitoring their environment in real time. Furthermore, the industry is taking a more proactive approach to mine closure. "Planning for closure at the start" is now a standard mantra. Financial assurance mechanisms ensure that funds are set aside for environmental rehabilitation, and social closure plans aim to mitigate the economic shock of a mine's eventual wind-down by diversifying the local economy well in advance. ESG is no longer a peripheral concern handled by a specialized department; it is the central operating system of the modern mining enterprise. By harmonizing governance standards, deploying clean technologies, and fostering genuine partnerships with communities, the sector is securing its place in a sustainable future. As the world transitions to a green economy, the dual role of these metals—gold as a stable store of value and silver as a critical industrial component—places responsible development at the heart of the global supply chain. ...Read more
Melbourne, Australia: Orica (ASX: ORI), today launched 4D™, its latest bulk explosives technology at MINExpo, Las Vegas. The revolutionary 4D™ bulk system enables the real-time tailoring of explosives energy to geology across a blast, delivering improvements in fragmentation, on bench productivity and an overall reduction in drill and blast costs. The 4D™ bulk explosives technology will enable Orica’s customers to seamlessly match a greater range of explosives energy across a mine’s geology and target specific blast outcomes in real-time. By combining emulsion blended with ammonium nitrate porous prills, 4D™ supports both pumped and augered loading methods across dry, wet and dewatered hole conditions. An outcome of this unique capability is greater on bench productivity by Orica’s fleet of 4D™ enabled Mobile Manufacturing Units (MMU™), without the need to change raw materials in the MMU™. Orica Chief Technology Officer, Angus Melbourne said: “Our 4D capability demonstrates the convergence of our new technologies and solutions, allowing our customers to think differently, mine more efficiently and operate more precisely. By combining our range of advanced digital, formulation chemistry and explosives delivery technologies with our technical expertise, we are able to offer this breakthrough solution that will unlock greater value for our customers across their operations.” Delivering up to 23% more relative bulk strength for hard rock applications and up to 43% reduction in soft rock1, 4D™ will enable a broader range of applications. In hard rock, the extra energy can be used to improve fragmentation in ore blasting, or to expand patterns while maintaining the same energy per bank cubic metre (BCM) to substantially reduce drill and blast costs. In softer geology, the potential of loading significantly lower energy products into wet holes leads to reduced cost and fume risk, as well as better management of blast vibration. Orica Vice President – Blasting Technology, Adam Mooney described the solution and the significant change in the application of explosives, saying: “Traditionally blast designs are often driven by Powder Factor, which is the overall consumption of explosives for the blast, rather than the energy required for different parts of the blast based on geology, resulting in the same type of explosive being applied across a blast pattern regardless of changes in geology or the required blast outcome. “4D now enables us to consider another dimension – the application of energy in real-time matched to the rock strength of the blast pattern as well as the desired blast outcomes, such as consistent fragmentation, fume risk reduction or better vibration control. This is a really powerful technology that will allow customers to manage their drill and blast operations and achieve improved blast outcomes.” 4D™ will be delivered through MMU™s equipped with LOADPlus™, Orica’s proprietary in-cab smart explosives delivery control system that enables the ease of manufacture and accurate and efficient delivery of formulated explosives products to plan. Integration with Orica’s suite of digital blasting technologies including BlastIQ™ and SHOTPlus™ will further enable customers to leverage seamless digital workflows including blast designs and blast quality assurance and control, as well as BlastIQ™ digital insights to continually optimise blasting outcomes. 4D™ is currently being developed across Orica’s Fortis™, Fortan™ and Aquacharge™ bulk systems. The technology will eventually be applied across Orica’s suite of bulk systems. The first release of 4D™ will begin with Australia from the end of the year with other regions to follow from 2022. ...Read more
Underground mine economics can shift faster than a fixed owner-mining model can comfortably absorb. Production plans change with commodity conditions and orebody knowledge, while capital priorities can reset the pace of development. Underground work still depends on skilled crews and specialized equipment governed by disciplined safety practices. For executives across APAC, the question is not simply whether a contractor can deliver development meters or production tons. It is whether that provider can give the mine enough flexibility to respond to change without weakening cost control or workforce standards. Schedule certainty also matters. Remote locations intensify the challenge because labor availability and equipment logistics can limit how quickly an owner responds, while cross-border projects expose management teams to different regulatory and sovereign-risk environments. Resource flexibility is central to that decision. A mine starting underground production may not have the people or fleet needed to build capability internally, and its management systems may still be immature. Established operators can face a different problem when expansions or changing production phases create temporary demand beyond internal capacity. The stronger contractor is able to mobilize qualified personnel and equipment at pace, then scale those resources when requirements shift. That flexibility reduces exposure to idle assets and workforce imbalances while preserving access to specialist expertise. Clear reporting and regular planning forums also help owners anticipate changes in mine infrastructure or resource needs before schedules are disrupted. “Byrnecut combines mechanized underground mine development and production expertise with specialized capabilities in raise drilling, shaft sinking, and workforce that strengthen project readiness.” Consistency matters just as much as scale. Underground projects are shaped by ground conditions and orebody geometry, while water inflow can alter equipment and support requirements. Production methods therefore need to fit the mine rather than follow a standard template. Safety and training practices, however, should remain disciplined across sites, as should equipment-care systems. Buyers should examine whether a provider can adapt mining decisions to local conditions while keeping crews aligned and maintenance predictable. Technology should be judged by practical application rather than adoption alone. Remote loading and automation can extend productive equipment time while reducing worker exposure in suitable areas, but not every underground environment is appropriate for automated movement. A capable contractor understands where technology adds value and where mine access patterns or mixed traffic make conventional methods more effective. Reliable underground communications remain essential for remote systems. The same discipline applies to equipment data. Real-time condition monitoring and predictive maintenance are most valuable when they enable earlier interventions that reduce unplanned breakdowns and improve equipment utilization. Technical collaboration strengthens that value further. A contractor able to contribute practical input to mine planning and scheduling, including infrastructure implications, can identify avoidable constraints before they reach the production cycle. Byrnecut stands out as a premier choice for APAC mine owners that need contracting scale and technical depth. The company combines mechanized underground mine development and production expertise with specialized capabilities in raise drilling, shaft sinking, and workforce that strengthen project readiness. Through its broader group capabilities, Byrnecut can also contribute mine design, engineering, and feasibility expertise where owners require deeper technical collaboration beyond contracting services. Its extensive mobile workforce, equipment fleet, and standardized safety and training systems provide the scale required to support complex, high-performance mining operations. Strong relationships with major OEMs, together with ongoing investment in automation and predictive maintenance, further enhance operational efficiency and equipment reliability. For buyers prioritizing rapid mobilization and consistent execution, Byrnecut presents a strong fit. ...Read more